11. Ragging the Classics, with some
help from the music of Mauro Giuliani and Fernando Sor
Ragtime: A Musical and Cultural
History
Edward A Berlin
University of California Press
Copyright 1980, 2002 by Edward
A Berlin
ISBN: 978-1-5040-30649-9
At Location 1521 and Location 1573, Edward
Berlin noted that the musical game of “ragging the classics” dated back to the
beginnings of the ragtime era. The basic
game was to translate an older established classical work into the new popular
style. Particularly popular for this
musical game were works by Mendelssohn, although works by Chopin, Liszt and
Rachmaninoff were also given a “ragging the classics” treatment.
As a guitarist with some familiarity with the
guitar sonatas of the early nineteenth century guitar virtuosi, I find it
easiest to demonstrate how “ragging the classics” could work by presenting a
before and after of a short excerpt from one of the guitar sonatas of Mauro
Giuliani, and Gran Sonata Eroica is probably one of the easiest works in the
early guitar sonata literature to rag.
To transform the theme into a rag one has only
to do the following:
A similar transformation into a ragtime style
is possible for Fernando Sor’s E flat etude from his Op. 29 series. Sor’s
charming little sonata in E flat major lends itself so readily to becoming a
ragtime piece very little has to be done.
Before:
And after:
Now just in adapting Sor’s Op. 29, study No.
10 I’ve already demonstrated how readily his little sonata movement could be
turned into a ragtime sonata. Of course
I deliberately interpolated material from another Sor etude into the
development section for the fun of it because that other hook from another Sor
etude can plausibly be thought of as a free inversion of Sor’s first theme in
the E flat etude.
Having rather briefly
demonstrated how “ragging the classics” , applied to early nineteenth century
guitar music by Giuliani and Sor, can use material from sonata movements, reversing
the process, writing sonatas with
ragtime themes, may nevertheless take a bit more theory and history. It shouldn’t need to, but the sheer scope and scale of Adorno’s ultimately
pernicious influence in debates about the merits and demerits of American
popular music merits a more detailed and patently theoretical discussion.
Proving Adorno wrong in music was the easy part, proving that Adorno was wrong
even on the basis of theoretical claims about the concepts of time and space in
music requires a rebuttal at the theoretical level on which Adorno made his
claims.





No comments:
Post a Comment