Thursday, July 04, 2024

building upon an older little side project ...

In offline world one of my siblings and I have had a game where we do title mash-ups for films and for songs.  In film we've coined stuff like Sleepaway Camp Highlander and I Spit on Your Grave of the Fireflies.  Ghost Dad in the Shell is another.  For songs ... 

https://wenatcheethehatchet.blogspot.com/2023/11/revisiting-title-game-some-more-song.html

Hold Your Head Up Ben 

We’ve Only Just Begun Burning Down the House

Kiss Me Deadly Man on the Corner

You Need to Calm Down, Mama

You Can’t Hurry Love Midnight Rambler

Truckin’, Space Trucking 

When Doves Cry "TV Dinners"  

Physical Bodies  

Hit Me With Your Best Shot Horse with No Name

Head Games Without Frontiers

Welcome to the Machine, Intruder

Well, Well, Well , Almost Paradise

Lovin’, Touchin’, Squeezin’ Fish Heads (War Pigs also works)

Suite: Judy Blue Eyes Without a Face 

 

A few additions

One of These Nights in White Satin

Lyin’ Eyes Without a Face (I had to go with the Paul Anka cover this time)

You Won’t See Me Dancing on the Ceiling

Unbreak My Heart-Shaped Box

Express Yourself Godzilla

Blank Space Oddity

Hey Mister Tamborine Man, Jump

 

New additions for the Fourth of July this year 

Imagine My Humps

Hey You I Need a Lover Who Won’t Drive Me Crazy

I’ll Be Alright Without You Material Girl

Lucky Starman

I Wouldn’t Want to Be Like You Mr. Tambourine Man

Everybody Hurts Black Betty


on Jacob Wright's alternative history for why the Bible began and its reception in the pages of The New Yorker

Why the Bible Began: An Alternative History of Scripture and its Origins
Jacob L. Wright
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/why-the-bible-began/263D2981C0B829268AAC8BB4A0F696FC

 

https://religionnews.com/2023/11/03/new-book-examines-how-the-bible-came-to-be-a-losers-tale/

 

Jacob L Wright has a book out and he contends:

 

The earliest biblical texts were, first and foremost, not religious writings, but a project of bringing together rival communities and affirming (contra-factually) that they all were originally one family that eventually became a nation at the moment of their liberation from slavery.

 

[skipping the interviewer's question here]

 

As generations of nameless scribes wove together pieces of their diverse pasts, they went to great lengths to remove the monarchy from the picture. Thus, David appears very late in the story. Many things happened before, and they happened without a native king to lead the way.

 

The reason why they created this “prehistory of peoplehood” is because they were working in very dark days, after imperial armies had conquered their kingdom and destroyed their land. Their narrative gave the defeated hope and inspired them to imagine a form of community that can survive the defeat of that kingdom.

 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/08/28/why-the-bible-began-an-alternative-history-of-scripture-and-its-origins-jacob-l-wright-book-review

How the Authors of the Bible Spun Triumph from Defeat

History may be written by the victors, but the world’s most influential text comes from antiquity’s biggest losers.

By Adam Gopnik

 

August 21, 2023

 

... Wright, like so many scholars these days, cannot resist projecting pluralist, post-Enlightenment values onto societies that made no pretense of possessing them. He cites enthusiastically, for instance, the scholar Catherine Keller’s reading of Genesis, which argues that in the priestly version of Genesis the word “Tehom,” usually translated as the inanimate form “the deep,” actually represents a female deity who joins Elohim in creation, and whose “enduring presence holds recreative potential,” such that “Elohim draws on this potential rather than mastering and dominating it, as in traditional paternal theologies.”

 

As always, we should be skeptical about claims that fit the taste and temper of our time. We badly want benevolent female deities to tame obnoxious male ones, but this doesn’t mean that any earlier reader understood it, or any earlier writer intended it, in quite this way. Wright’s inclination to think that even the patriarchs might not be truly patriarchal can occasionally contort his prose and his perspective. (In the book’s introduction, he does admit, disarmingly, that he doesn’t entirely like the Bible, mandating as it does the execution of disobedient children.) Certainly, a culture that treats menstruating women as unclean cannot easily be made into a feminist one.

 

For all that, the interpolation of our Progressive narrative within the existing Palace and People’s narratives seems, after Wright’s arguments, newly graced by tradition. Given the Bible’s pliability, its kludgy fusing of one story into another, surely our ways of telling it are as legitimate as any other. The story may seem frozen, as Rebbe Schneerson seems frozen in his Polish eighteenth-century garb, but, still, it moves. All religions are a set of practices before they are a set of articulated beliefs, and perhaps the key ritual practice of the Jews was prose-writing. Sacred books are far from commonplace in ancient religions. (The Homeric epic, that Greek equivalent, is a war-and-adventure story with the gods attendant; and the rules of how to please them, or the impossibility of ever doing so, are inferred from the story, not announced within it. The Ten Commandments of paganism are winked by Zeus to his favorites.)

 

A nation is its narration. By first exploding its internal differences and then annealing them in imaginative fictions at best loosely based in history—exactly as was done in this country for so long—a coherently incoherent tale gets told. To say that the Judaeans and the Israelites and their spiritual descendants are the people of the book makes sense only if we think of books as books truly are: that is, badly reviewed, sporadically revived, occasionally rediscovered, and, if any good at all, perpetually misread. The cracks and crevices, not to mention the palimpsests and overlays, in the Bible as it really is make for an ever more modern text. We like broken books, and this is one.

 

Published in the print edition of the August 28, 2023, issue, with the headline “The Biggest Losers.”


For those who have actually read Jacob Wright his contention has been that the genius of nascent Jewish scripture is the scribes who assembled it did not attempt to smooth out any of the tensions and contradictions in the narratives, texts or law codes. Instead they put everything together in a sweeping narrative of a lost past, one which may largely be fictious, but which presented the Samarian and Judean kingdoms as having come under the judgment of Yahweh because kings abused their royal power, priests abused and hoarded cultic knowledge, and misrepresented the nature of the divine will to masses who were themselves not obedient to the Lord.  Wright contends, and this is a scholarly consensus regarding Hebrew prophetic books in contrast to almost all forms of ancient near eastern divinatory practices as political speech, the Hebrew Bible presents us with prophet after prophet relentlessly announcing the pending and utterly deserved demise of kingdom after kingdom. 

Sunday, June 30, 2024

Freddie deBoer on the gaslighting in education journalism in the United States on the surmise that spending more money on education must inevitably yield better student outcomes

https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/elite-education-journalism-still

…

What you get a lot of, these days, is education researchers assembling very complex (and thus opaque) models that seem designed specifically to arrive at the conclusion that school funding can fix education, whatever that means. On the other side, you have, well, reality. Reality is not kind to this idea. We live in a reality where New York annually spends the most on school funding per pupil while barely outperforming Utah, which spends the least; where the United States, a very rich country, spends around eight times as much per pupil as Vietnam, a very poor country, and yet is essentially at parity in international educational comparisons; where the United Kingdom spends dramatically more on education than South Korea but does dramatically worse. We’ve been regressing expenditures on outcomes for a long time and getting the same result - money doesn’t determine student performance. And, really… why would it?

The dynamic is found at every level you choose to look at. Detroit significantly outspends Ann Arbor in per-pupil funding. 56% of students in Ann Arbor public schools met state standards in math proficiency in 2023; in Detroit public schools, that figure was 9%. If you think racial demographics are too big of a confound for that to be a good comparison, consider West Virginia’s McDowell County School District (88% white, $13,070 per student per year, 18% proficient in math) and Jefferson County School District (75% white, $12,438 per student per year, 32% proficient in math). Washington DC spends extravagantly on schools in both a national and international context; their quantitative outcomes are consistently awful. There is no credible argument that student performance is a function of how much their school, district, state, or country spends on schooling, none. And the argument that such spending even meaningfully influences student performance is remarkably thin on the ground. After all, if they had a big influence, well, they’d be having a big influence.

…

… Trying to use school funding to juice grades, test scores, or graduation rates is an experiment that has been failing for longer than I’ve been alive. Asked and answered, guys. Asked and answered.

I don’t use this term often, but this sure feels like what people mean when they use the term gaslighting. You have a country that spends profligately on education but which dramatically underperforms many others that spend much less, you have the same dynamics in states and districts, and you have an elite consensus whereby New York Times reporter Sarah Mervosh doesn’t just suggest that the consensus is correct, she insists on it as an assumption that will not be challenged in her piece. The best we get is vague stabs at the cost-benefit analysis, which is then not actually performed. I’m surprised she didn’t trot out Eric Hanushek so he can continue his years-long publicity apology tour.

For those who didn't catch this earlier entry from deBoer he could be said to have noted that Nathan Robinson gaslit into him about education with an argument that amounted to a "spare no expense and the students will learn" approach.

https://wenatcheethehatchet.blogspot.com/2022/07/freddie-deboer-and-nathan-robinson.html

further developments in the Robert Morris' resignation from Gateway Church coverage, considering the question of why Mark "I see things" Driscoll didn't or doesn't seem to have been able to "see" things about Robert Morris

We’ve noted that Robert Morris stepped down from pastoring Gateway Church recently and revisited Robert Morris’ self-credited role in advising Mark Driscoll to resign from Mars Hill in 2014 to take time off and heal up before going back into ministry, but there have been new developments in the last week. 

https://wenatcheethehatchet.blogspot.com/2014/12/2-5-2008-spiritual-warfare-part-3-part_83.html

https://wenatcheethehatchet.blogspot.com/2014/12/2-5-2008-spiritual-warfare-part-3-part_73.html

Owing to the purges of Mars Hill materials online a substitute from the original source link is necessary.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVGfBvC6-zU

 

(00:19:11)

…

4. Tell me everything you see no matter how odd it may seem. Some people actually see things. This may be gift of discernment.

On occasion I see things. I see things. Like I was meeting with one person, and they didn't know this but they were abused when they were a child and I said, "When you were a child, you were abused. This person did this to you, physically touched you this way." They said, "How do you know?" I said, "I don't know, it's like I got a TV right here and I'm seeing it." They said, "No, that never happened." I said, "Go ask them. Go ask if they actually did what I think they did and I see that they did."  They went and asked this person, "When I was a little kid did you do this?" and the person said, "Yeah [slowly], but you were only like a year or two old. How do you remember that?" They said, "Well, Pastor Mark told me." I'm not a guru. I'm not a freak. I don't talk about this. If I did talk about it everybody'd want to meet with me and I'd end up like one of those guys on TV, but some of you have this visual ability to see things.

Sometimes your counselee, they will see things. I found this with people, I'm, okay,-like, "I'm gonna ask the demon questions, you tell me what they say."  They don't say anything. I say, "What do you hear?" and they say, "Nothing, but I'm seeing stuff."
"What, oh, oh. What's that?"
"I'm seeing, you know, when I was little, my grandpa molested me. I didn't know that."


I said, "Well, let's not assume it's true. Go ask your grandpa." Grandpa says, "Yeah [slowly], when you were little I molested you." Grandpa was assuming they'd be too young to remember so he'd only molest grandkids up until a certain age. But they saw it. Supernatural. It's a whole other realm. It's like the Matrix. You can take the blue pill. You can take the red pill.  You can go into this whole other world and that's the way it works.

So I say tell me everything you hear, tell me everything you see and sometimes I see things, too. I see things, too.  I've seen women raped.

I've seen children molested. I've seen people abused. I've seen people beaten. I've seen horrible things done. Horrible things done.

I've seen children dedicated in occult groups, and demons come upon them as an infant by invitation and I wasn't present for any of it but I've seen it, visibly.

Upon occasion when I get up to preach I see, just like a [makes "whif" sound] screen in front of me, I'll see somebody get raped or abused and I'll track `em down and say, "Look, I had this vision, let me tell you about it." All true.  One I had, I was sitting in my office at the old Earl building.  This gal walks by, nice gal, member of the church. This was when the church was small.  And there just like a TV was there and I saw the night before her husband threw her up against the wall, had her by the throat, was physically violent with her and she said, "That's it. I'm telling the pastor." And he said, "If you do, I'll kill you." He was a very physically abusive man. She was walking by and I just saw it. Just like a TV.  I said, "Hey! come here for a sec. ... Last night did your husband throw you against the wall and have you by the throat, physically assault you and tell you if you told anyone he would kill you?" She just starts bawling. She says, "How did you know?" I said, "Jesus told me." I call the guy on the phone, "Hey, I need you to come to the office." Didn't give him any clue. [He] comes in. I said, "What did you do to your wife last night?  Why'd you this? Why'd you throw her against the wall?" And he gets very angry, they're sitting on the couch, he says, "Why did you tell him?"  I said, "She didn't, Jesus did." Jesus did. 

…

But for all those claimed super-powers apparently literally on loan from God, Mark Driscoll had no inkling that Robert Morris allegedly molested a girl when she was 12 until she was 16 years old?  Would not that have been precisely the kind of thing, based on Mark Driscoll’s claims about “I see things” that he should have perceived about Robert Morris decades ago?  And what of recent reports just in the last week?

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/texas/news/4-gateway-church-elders-take-leave-amid-

investigation-into-allegations-involving-pastor-robert-morris/

 

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/24/nx-s1-5017881/robert-morris-gateway-church-sex-abuse-scandal-explained

 

https://www.christianpost.com/news/gateway-church-elders-robert-morris-son-take-leave-of-absence.html

 

as reported by Mike Hixenbaugh for NBC:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/robert-morris-gateway-church-sex-abuse-accuser-phone-call-rcna159153

 

Robert Morris, a pastor and the founder of Gateway Church, wanted to know what it was going to take to prevent the woman on the phone from going public with her accusation that he’d sexually abused her as a child.

“Put a price on it,” Morris said on Sept. 22, 2005, according to a document that appears to be a transcript of a phone call. The document was provided to NBC News by a former Gateway staff member.

…

The document — titled “Transcription of recorded phone conversation with Cindy Clemishire” — was provided to NBC News by a former member of Gateway’s IT department. The worker said he discovered the Microsoft Word document more than a decade ago while transferring files from Morris’ computer to a new laptop. The IT worker shared the transcript on the condition that he not be named.

The document sat for years on a shared server at Gateway that primarily held archival sermon notes and was accessible to members of Gateway’s technology teams, the worker said. Metadata from the document shows it was created on Oct. 19, 2007, about two years after the call, at a time when Clemishire said she and Morris were negotiating a possible legal settlement that never materialized. The file was created by someone who listed their title as “Administrator” and company as “Gateway Church,” and has not been modified since the day it was created, according to its metadata.

…

https://julieroys.com/phone-transcript-shows-robert-morris-asked-victim-for-price-to-buy-her-silence/

 

Did Mark “I see things” Driscoll not know of any of that at the time he stood on the stage at the behest of Robert Morris at the Gateway conference in 2014 shortly after his resignation from Mars Hill Church?  So far it would seem that Driscoll did not "see" the molestation reported or the reported phone conversation.  Now as a caveat, I would venture to say that if the field of psychology and counseling had not developed the idea of recovered memory practices Mark Driscoll could not have made use of them in his demonic counseling sessions (take the ambiguity of that phrasing as deliberate). Driscoll could not be wielding therapeutic jargon to advice one of the Lindells to "differentiate" if no one had formulated the concept of things like an undifferentiated ego mass in family dynamics. But, with those thoughts in mind, Mark Driscoll's counseling sessions probably involved written materials so his reads were not "cold" reading of a counselee but relatively "warm" or "hot" readings based on known histories. That the results may have been a mutual confabulation on the part of counselor and counselee might mean nothing more than that Mark Driscoll did what any number of licensed professionals managed to do from the 1980s into the 1990s. 


Which might, potentially, be an explanation for why, if Mark Driscoll never knew anything of allegations against Robert Morris, he wouldn't have even stopped to conceive of such things being possible.  Driscoll's "sight" needed enough background on his counselees from which to develop some kind of conjecture, which might not even potentially exist for men whose public support and patronage Mark Driscoll relied upon to rehabilitate his reputation just enough to launch The Trinity Church..


Meanwhile, those glowing endorsement blurbs Robert Morris gave for Mark Driscoll’s Charisma House publications aren’t going away until new editions of Spirit-Filled Jesus, Win Your War and Pray Like Jesus come along.


UPDATE 7-1-2024

In light of reported claims from Driscoll about what he perceived to be spiritually negative influences in John Lindell's church earlier this year the lack of any comparable claims made by (or at least credited to) Mark Driscoll about Robert Morris becomes more striking.