For those who haven't seen the FY2013 report, well, you may be sort of out of luck if you want to see it with your own eyes.
[UPDATE 1-12-2014, thanks to commenter Winston we've been directed to a page that presents the report for FY2013. It looks a bit different than the version WtH saw earlier but this appears to be mainly in color and other elements of layout rather than in statistics]
http://marshill.com/annual-report-2013
http://marshill.com/files/2013/12/18/MHC_Annual_Report_2013_o_web.pdf
[UPDATE 1-12-2014, thanks to commenter Winston we've been directed to a page that presents the report for FY2013. It looks a bit different than the version WtH saw earlier but this appears to be mainly in color and other elements of layout rather than in statistics]
http://marshill.com/annual-report-2013
http://marshill.com/files/2013/12/18/MHC_Annual_Report_2013_o_web.pdf
Let's just start with some basics. Anyone who's read citations from the Fy2012 report may remember this number:
(go ahead click on this puppy to see how big it really is)
As in the stated number of the average weekly attendance at Mars Hill Church.
Each dot represented one person and the blue dots represented newcomers, 2,796 in all.
Then there were the following figures for baptisms, total members, and kids each week.
Now in a pdf made available at some website affiliated with Mars Hill Church back in December 2013 a report was made available that features these numbers for FY2013.
(that 12,329 number isn't quite so big in real life, either, on the report)
Check out the average weekly attendance listed in what appears to be a FY2013 MHC annual report, that's 12,329 average. While 1,337 members were added the grand total number of members of Mars HIll Church only increased by a total of a net total of 60 members between FY2012 and FY2013. Curious. If your organization has a net gain of formal members of a mere sixty after getting more than 1,200 newbies that's obviously not very awesome net growth.
Let's consider the giving trends as they break out by campus. For FY2012 we got this:
The FY2012 web page was made not as a pdf but as a mass of constituent parts, which makes it hard to download the whole thing as a simple unified pdf-style whole but makes it hugely easy to consult constituent parts to compare the report to something else such as the corresponding data from the FY2013 report which says ...
A little footnote here on the percentages before we proceed, check out the Fy2012 pie chart:
Compared to FY2012's listing the percentage of people who gave $0 went from 23.9% to 35.1%. Interesting. [WtH at 11:53pm---comparing this percentage of 0 donors to previous annual reports it also looks like possibly the highest ratio of non-givers at MHC in the last five fiscal years]
The number of people who gave between $1-$499 went from 42.9% to 29.5%. It looks like they're losing the bottom of the pyramid in terms of lowest-level donors but that Mars Hill Church is gaining in the mid-tier and major donor categories. But no organization can rely entirely on the top-tier for long. You have to mobilize your base-level, low-end donors. It's not safe to assume that some kind of Pareto principle means you can effectively ignore your base. Let's not forgot if the numbers presented in the MHC FY2013 report hold up a whopping 64.6 percent of donors to Mars Hill in FY2013 either gave nothing at all or gave no more than $1-$499 for the fiscal year. Since the report doesn't quite clarify if this is a reference to cumulative giving (which it has been in reports past) or averages there's possible wiggle room for additional information. Anyway, enough commentary on the aggregates. Some campus shifts in giving are worth looking at.
Now here is where the numbers get interesting as a manifestation of shifts. Certain shifts are so obvious they almost don't seem to be worth mentioning. Let's mention them anyway. Obviously moving live preaching from Mars Hill Ballard to Mars Hill Bellevue could explain a significant drop in the giving patterns at Ballard and this would be likely even if Bill Clem hadn't resigned from being a pastor at Mars Hill Church at the start of 2013. Ballard, all told, looks like it had a nearly 2 million dollar drop in total giving per fiscal year to the general giving fund. The actual difference is $1,972,010.00.
Compared to FY2012's listing the percentage of people who gave $0 went from 23.9% to 35.1%. Interesting. [WtH at 11:53pm---comparing this percentage of 0 donors to previous annual reports it also looks like possibly the highest ratio of non-givers at MHC in the last five fiscal years]
The number of people who gave between $1-$499 went from 42.9% to 29.5%. It looks like they're losing the bottom of the pyramid in terms of lowest-level donors but that Mars Hill Church is gaining in the mid-tier and major donor categories. But no organization can rely entirely on the top-tier for long. You have to mobilize your base-level, low-end donors. It's not safe to assume that some kind of Pareto principle means you can effectively ignore your base. Let's not forgot if the numbers presented in the MHC FY2013 report hold up a whopping 64.6 percent of donors to Mars Hill in FY2013 either gave nothing at all or gave no more than $1-$499 for the fiscal year. Since the report doesn't quite clarify if this is a reference to cumulative giving (which it has been in reports past) or averages there's possible wiggle room for additional information. Anyway, enough commentary on the aggregates. Some campus shifts in giving are worth looking at.
Now here is where the numbers get interesting as a manifestation of shifts. Certain shifts are so obvious they almost don't seem to be worth mentioning. Let's mention them anyway. Obviously moving live preaching from Mars Hill Ballard to Mars Hill Bellevue could explain a significant drop in the giving patterns at Ballard and this would be likely even if Bill Clem hadn't resigned from being a pastor at Mars Hill Church at the start of 2013. Ballard, all told, looks like it had a nearly 2 million dollar drop in total giving per fiscal year to the general giving fund. The actual difference is $1,972,010.00.
Ballard wasn't the only campus to experience a drop in cumulative giving to the general fund. Mars Hill Downtown's giving from FY2012 to FY2013 dropped by $94,687.00, and that could be explicable, perhaps, by the departure of not only the lead pastor Tim Gaydos but also of Tim Beltz and Will Little. While A. J. Hamilton was the interim lead pastor for a time he became the lead pastor at Downtown until he was recently replaced as lead pastor by someone else Wenatchee's never heard of before.
The Shoreline campus seemed to experience a drop from FY2012 to FY2013 that looks about like $5,462, a relatively negligible drop as things go. But it's important to bear in mind that when Driscoll did his financial updates on Mars Hill around May and June 2012 Shoreline was running the biggest systemic deficit. Even a small drop in giving could be a huge problem for a campus if it has continued to run the largest systemic deficit in the entire organization on a campus-by-campus basis.
More significant as a formal drop are the $87,911 drop at Mars Hill University District, and the $31,037 drop at Mars Hill West Seattle took place between FY2012 and FY2013. These sort of look like campuses where transitions of employment may have happened but that in itself couldn't explain anything. Willie Wilson vanished from leadership at Rainier Valley and giving has gone up.
Less easily spotted would be changes in which average giving declined. For instance, Mars Hill Federal Way experienced a drop in average giving per donor but a pending church plant or two might possibly explain that. Bubba Jennings is still slated to plant Mars Hill Tacoma, right? That could explain everything right there. Even though giving in total has gone up the average might have gone down because of where the resources are going. After all general giving fund wouldn't be the same as restricted giving or giving to expansion projects.
It's no surprise the biggest spike in growth has been Mars Hill Bellevue. Where Mark is the money will obviously follow. Plus anyone with any length of experience in observing fundraising in the Puget Sound area can tell you that if you want the bigger money you have to turn your attention to Bellevue and the east side anyway.
Now for those who aren't completely bored already here's a compilation of figures from the FY2013 report that was available last month and the still available Financial Disclosure agreement on FY2012 that you may still be able to find. Along the way some numbers from FY2011 have been consulted.
| ABBREVIATED BALANCE SHEET RESULTS | |||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
| ASSETS | |||
| cash & cash equivalents | $ 5,165,170.00 | $ 3,369,472.00 | $ 5,341,040.00 |
| accounts receivable | $ - | $ 30,302.00 | $ 192,323.00 |
| inventory and other current assets | $ 81,041.00 | $ 203,685.00 | $ 515,751.00 |
| lease deposits and other assets | $ 118,011.00 | $ 136,718.00 | $ 180,269.00 |
| property and equipment | $ 27,099,676.00 | $ 28,650,133.00 | $ 28,663,705.00 |
| deferred loan costs, net | $ 41,642.00 | $ 37,273.00 | $ 34,531.00 |
| LIABILITIES | |||
| current liabilities | $ 3,070,910.00 | $ 1,931,392.00 | $ 2,097,035.00 |
| long-term liabilities | $ 13,121,525.00 | $ 13,285,248.00 | $ 12,146,688.00 |
| total liabilities | $ 16,192,435.00 | $ 15,216,640.00 | $ 14,243,723.00 |
| NET ASSETS | |||
| unrestricted | $ 16,387,843.00 | $ 17,364,950.00 | $ 19,959,873.00 |
| temporarily restricted | $ 126,946.00 | $ 118,993.00 | $ 724,023.00 |
| total net assets | $ 16,514,789.00 | $ 17,483,943.00 | $ 20,683,896.00 |
There are more things that could be written but for now these numbers will suffice. Wenatchee The Hatchet has covered Mars Hill adapting to numeric decline in the past. If we compare the 13,173 to the 12,329 a cumulative drop in average attendance of 844 isn't even really all that bad. Sure, the net growth of 60 members despite adding 1,337 members doesn't seem encouraging but as noted recently, Sutton Turner happily informed Mars Hill that giving is very high and above and beyond what was asked for. While certain campuses had losses in numbers and revenue that was going to happen with the resignations that happened in 2013 and with live preaching moving to Bellevue. As it stands Mars Hill would not have bothered looking for a Capital Development Manager if they didn't feel confident about giving. Whether or not the capital campaign projects being planned for 2014 on out are smarter ideas than the capital campaign project of 2004-2005 is open for some debate once we find out what those things are.
So even though the Fy2013 report was given and then taken away in terms of internet accessiblity Wenatchee The Hatchet did get ahold of it, or so it seems. And the numbers are interesting. Driscoll shared in the summer of 2012 that Mars Hill had hit a rough season financially. In early 2013 he shared how Mars Hill avoided its own fiscal cliff and how Mars Hill was not a wealthy church. But this does not keep nearly every fiscal year from seeming to be the best year ever when it comes time for annual reports, which have seemed to come later and later after the end of each fiscal year and most recently seems to have taken shape in the form of a report you probably can't even find and download any longer. Well, maybe there's going to be a FY2013 financial dislosure statement that will be available some time in 2014. We'll see.
So even though the Fy2013 report was given and then taken away in terms of internet accessiblity Wenatchee The Hatchet did get ahold of it, or so it seems. And the numbers are interesting. Driscoll shared in the summer of 2012 that Mars Hill had hit a rough season financially. In early 2013 he shared how Mars Hill avoided its own fiscal cliff and how Mars Hill was not a wealthy church. But this does not keep nearly every fiscal year from seeming to be the best year ever when it comes time for annual reports, which have seemed to come later and later after the end of each fiscal year and most recently seems to have taken shape in the form of a report you probably can't even find and download any longer. Well, maybe there's going to be a FY2013 financial dislosure statement that will be available some time in 2014. We'll see.
UPDATE 1-12-2014
Thanks (again) to Winston for pointing out where the FY2013 report is available. Wenatchee's not going to claim to have the best eyes around. :)






