Saturday, April 12, 2025

Luca Stricagnoli does Mozart's Turkish March on a guitar


Though I am far, far more a fan of Haydn than Mozart this one's worth watching because the music is good (I didn't say I hate Mozart) and Stricagnoli's doing two-handed tapping on the guitar (note the sock strategically wrapped around the neck close to the nut).  It's like his right and left hand are Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers doing some dance routine that gets the music to sound.  

Or maybe Gene Kelly and Donald O'Connor from the first half of Singin' in the Rain.

I could say we guitarists have shown more and more interest in adapting and investigating non-guitar music across a variety of genres in the last fifty years but it is not always clear if there are any signs that non-guitarist musicians are returning the favor.  

Then again the fiftieth anniversary of the release of Innervisions came and went recently and I haven't heard of a single academic book about that incredible album being published. As Kyle Gann ranted in The Musicology Ladder there's a bunch of theorists who'd rather crank out the 100th book on Brahms or Schubert or the usual suspects than to put out one brand new book doing a deep dive into the piano sonatas of Muzio Clementi (Mozart ripped on Clementi but his music wasn't actually all that bad, some of his pieces are fine). 

Regulars know that despite all the delays and fits my passion project is to go through all the solo guitar sonatas of the Bohemian guitarist composer Wenzel Matiegka. I not only take Gann's point I'd double down on it and say that I have not come across anyone attempt to synthesize and observe 20th century approaches to sonata forms in just the classical guitar literature.  I can hope that someone like Anthony Glise or Stanley Yates could tackle the topic but the person who most jumped to mind as writer enough and composer enough to have pulled off the feat in my estimation (Angelo Gilardino) is, sadly, no longer with us.  Ophee could have done it, too, probably.  But I digress.  

Marek Pasieczny, SUSURRUS VI for Percussion and Guitar

Why wouldn't I share a piece for classical guitar and percussion.  The composer has pretty detailed notes about what his thought process and inspirations were for this piece. 


The second movement kicking off with the percussionist drawing a violin bow across a gong is fun stuff but the whole thing has an intriguing ambience.  It's got a very spatialized approach to contrasting sonorities of the kind I have usually heard from Takemitsu's work for the guitar but Pasieczny is a contemporary Polish guitarist and composer and I don't know enough about his influences to know of TT is in there or not. In any case, I dig the piece and wanted to share it. 

Daniela Rossi plays Dusan Bogdanovic's Variaciones casi Latinas

 Bodanovic has composed for the guitar in avant garde and jazz idioms for decades.  He's expressed ambivalence about how effective jazz and classical fusions have been in the last fifty years but here in 2025 I'd say it can hardly hurt to try.  Classical guitar being vastly more niche than either any kind of jazz or classical music in general it's not like a sea of people know about this repertoire.

So I lose nothing but sharing works that explore this territory.  I dare say the sheer physical constraints and technical limitations of the guitar have precluded the kind of let-the-fingers-do-the-flying things that can happen when pianists write jazz-classical fusions.  Ethan Iverson has written about Kapustin and Bolling not being his thing and I can get that sentiment, and I also reiterate that pianists have more temptations.  We guitarists have to be at such a different level of conceptual and technical mastery to even start doing bad jazz there's a kind of floor, I guess, that precludes bad solo guitar jazz/classical synthesis experiments in a way that bad solo piano jazz/classical synthesis experiments may open the floodgates for.

Some scattered thoughts on that topic and now for the musical piece.

Freddie deBoer's riff on John Oliver reminds me of other scenes

It's for paid subscribers and so obviously I'm not going to quote from deep cut paragraphs as I am not subscribed but ... what's available even to non-subscribers has a point I couldn't help but consider:

... supporters of trans rights have to do something that John Oliver trains them not to do: actually engage, argue, persuade, act in general as if there’s work to be done and that we can’t simply sit around feeling superior, chuckling to ourselves on our $15/month premium cable channel. ...  You can’t have it both ways: if this is a crisis, you have to hustle and fight like it’s a crisis. You can’t expect to joke your way out of it.  
and yet a few paragraphs earlier deBoer did write "... I sometimes wonder if his show is a brilliant op pulled off by the Heritage Foundation."  There's no tension between talking about crises and joking your way through them.  It's a simple distinction.  

Not that I have any reason to tune into John Oliver as such, and I get that deBoer finds Oliver symptomatic of a vice of our times.  There are people whose business model depends upon smug condescension about how stupid all "those people" are in contrast to my enlightened self and my coterie of self-selecting fans.  But Oliver is hardly alone in the era of partisan agitprop infotainment.  

It's not like the Moscow Mood isn't a combination of endless jokes in which Doug is practically operantly signaling his fans to laugh while he has perorations on the crises of our era.  The strange mixture of smug triumphalism with admonitions to utter dismay at "what we've come to" is so much the water we fish swim in I get deBoer having a singular disdain for John Oliver but as the saying goes no one snowflake feels responsible for being part of the storm.