Pages
- Home
- a page with an index of tagged posts discussing the history of the former Mars Hill Church
- a page with an index of posts on music and musical analysis--guitar sonatas and contrapuntal music for guitar and other musical stuff
- writings at Mbird on animation, superheroes and other things (nobody cares about Jarvis Pennyworth)
Saturday, January 31, 2026
Perichoresis in Musical Time and Space: a draft toward thinking through Trinitarian ontological reflection, sensory integration, and the process of sensory integration as a metaphor for coordinating theories rather than setting them against each other (like sight against hearing)
Thursday, January 29, 2026
Alan Jacobs quotes Northrop Frye on what "Romance" is as a genre and how it isn't what people tend to think it is ...
Romance: Not what people today call romance — i.e., a story about luuuvv — but rather a story that has a more capacious sense of the real than the realistic novel typically has. So Northrop Frye in a discussion of kinds of hero:If superior in degree to other men and to his environment, the hero is the typical hero of romance, whose actions are marvellous but who is himself identified as a human being. The hero of romance moves in a world in which the ordinary laws of nature are slightly suspended: prodigies of courage and endurance, unnatural to us, are natural to him, and enchanted weapons, talking animals, terrifying ogres and witches, and talismans of miraculous power violate no rule of probability once the postulates of romance have been established. Here we have moved from myth, properly so called, into legend, folk tale, märchen, and their literary affiliates and derivatives.
Tuesday, January 27, 2026
The 2020s form of "where are the evangelical intellectuals?" question, and the question of whether there is or can be an evangelical elite in the United States, a sampling from Mere Orthodoxy, Old Life and Aaron Renn's Substack and First Things article
https://mereorthodoxy.com/the-promise-of-a-christian-small-magazine
January 26th, 2026
By Jake Meador
... Really, the best way to read Schaeffer is not even to regard him as
an intellectual himself, so much as someone who attempted to relate to
intellectuals in the same way that someone like Hudston Taylor related to the
Chinese. In other words, Schaeffer was less an intellectual himself and more a
very sensitive and shrewd missionary to readers of the intellectuals.
That reminds me … of
something from years ago …
https://mereorthodoxy.com/francis-schaeffer-and-christian-intellectualism
and how D. G. Hart wrote a
response to Meador’s older piece saying:
https://oldlife.org/2016/08/23/was-francis-schaeffer-an-intellectual/
I wasn’t reading Time in 1960 but fifteen years later
I was reading Schaeffer and the better description of the apologist is not as
missionary to intellectuals but missionary to would-be intellectuals. …
Francis Schaeffer as a missionary to would-be intellectuals is pretty blunt but probably also very true.