Mark Driscoll revisits what he says was his most controversial ("How dare you!?") moment in his public career--a counter-proposal that his old Edinburgh, Scotland from 2007 is more controversial given that it was the basis for cutting off a radio broadcast of one of his sermons mid-broadcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmXrx_MRPDs&t=9s 

What sticks with me, if you went through the above account as I did, is that it seems there is nothing so terrible that can happen to a person that, should she share that story with Pastor Mark Driscoll, he will decide that ultimately it's not actually a good idea to share it in public for the record as the defense for why he said something incendiary in a sermon that could and should (if that's possible) be defended on grounds that don't require sharing the woman's story.