Saturday, August 29, 2026

Joseph Horowitz has been mulling over the state of US classical music across 250 years and it's predominantly musings on the state of orchestral repertoire

I am not going to attempt to summarize or describe Joseph Horowitz’ eight takes on the question of whether or not the United States has delivered on its classical music promise.  If you have read them you have read them, too, and if not, here are links.

 

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/06/at-250-has-america-delivered-on-its-classical-music-promise.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/07/jonas-kaufmann-vs-the-orchestra-of-st-lukes-take-two-mahler-steinbach-festival.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/07/american-classical-music-at-250-take-two-the-bam-experiment.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/07/american-classical-music-at-250-take-three-the-orchestra-gap-europe-vs-the-us.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/07/american-classical-music-at-250-take-four-the-orchestra-gap-contd.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/08/feeling-it-giuini-and-arrau-vs-george-szells-new-world-perfectionism.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/08/american-classical-music-at-250-take-five-the-disconnect-between-scholars-and-orchestras.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/08/american-classical-music-at-250-take-six-the-ford-foundations-misguided-philanthropy.html

https://www.artsjournal.com/uq/2026/08/american-classical-music-at-250-take-seven-another-boston-symphony-perspective-on-the-malaise-afflicting-orchestras.html

 

The thing that jumps out for me is that even the one time Future Symphony Institute is now the Foundation for the Future of Classical Music.  They don’t even call themselves the Future Symphony Institute anymore.  They still want a future for orchestral and symphonic music, of course, because while Roger Scruton has died many of the people at the core of the institution have remained.  I kind of started tuning them out after Scruton died but also after Douglas Murray got added on to the senior fellows roster.  I had my issues with Scruton but I do still own half a dozen of his books.  Writers like the late Roger Scruton and Theodor Adorno can benefit you when you don’t agree with them. 

 

Being a guitarist I find that I am more drawn to hearing what is going on now than in revisiting past glories.  Matanya Ophee is no longer with us but he dispelled the idea that the classical guitar ever had an actual golden age.  Do sonatas by Sor or Giuliani compare to the works of Schubert or Mendelssohn?  Most would say not favorably.  On the other hand, when Stephanie Jones gave a recital in Seattle a few seasons ago I enjoyed her program of contemporary Australian and Austrian composers writing for the guitar.  I am looking forward to the second half of Nikita Koshkin’s 24 Preludes and Fugues finally getting recorded.  I just noted recently the death of Frank Campo as reported at Slipped Disc. 

 

Jens Ibsen has floated some ideas that self-policing within genres can stifle innovation.  Ibsen has contended that within the United States classical music is functionally underground music now.

https://sfclassicalvoice.substack.com/p/classical-music-is-underground-let

 

I wonder if that’s a bit of an overstatement but for contemporary composers I think I can take the point as given.  Anyone who is attempting to build bridges between classical and metal is already interested in inter-canonical experimentation that I can be sympathetic to.  The concept of inter-canonical translation and exchange comes up inIbsen’s profile on Jon Batiste. I’m okay with a slow-drag reworking of a Mozart warhorse. Ragging the classics has been a thread of improvisational and compositional activity for centuries.  Batiste is also correct to say that improvisation was previously inextricably bound up in musical life and practice in the days of Mozart and got steadily purged out of classical music theory and practice. 

 

If arts non-profits are having a banner bad year then the future of classical music in the United States probably isn’t “entirely” bound up in the states of institutions.

 

I haven’t been to orchestral concerts in decades and I have nothing against orchestral music.  I went and heard the symphonic suite Mathis der Maler when it was programmed.  Yes, I am a bit of a Hindemith fan.  I went and heard Samuel Jones’ Tuba Concerto twice and even bought the score.  I liked Wynton Marsalis’ Violin Concerto, which I feel is several steps above what he was doing with All Rise (which I really wanted to like but couldn’t get into).  I even recently listened to a violin concerto by Kip Winger.  Don’t know who that is?  Well, I still hate the band Winger but Kip Winger’s violin concerto is solidly made.

 

But to me the present and future of classical music is in small-scale works.  It’s not going to surprise anyone if a guitarist feels the present and future of classical music is more likely to be found in guitar music than in orchestral literature.  I have made this point a few times over the last ten years but I think the symphony has gone the way of the votive mass for the dead; the prestige of the genre and form hasn’t gone away but the niche nature of the musical form means it has lost its place of prestige.  Richard Taruskin pointed out that the social role of opera was displaced by cinema and television and that’s basically not going to come back.

 

I have not written as much about Regaining Classical Music's Relevance: Saving the Muse in a Troubled World as I, at one point, planned to.  I have had concerns about how easily John Borstlap decided to valorize Schleiermacher and scapegoat Herder.  Both philosophers were not “just” philosophers but Christian pastors and theologians both of them advocated aesthetic pluralism as well as encouraged nascent nationalist projects.  It’s possible to admire Schleiermacher’s ardor for aesthetic pluralism and music while agree with Emil Brunner that the trajectory of Schleiermacher’s thought and theology was ultimately a dead end. 

 

It is possible to regard Herder as more complex than Borstlap has allowed for.  American fundamentalist preachers who think Song of Songs is chiefly about the joys of marriage and sex don’t give Herder any credit for having swept allegorical and typological readings of Song of Songs away for a newer interpretive approach.  I can think of Schleiermacher as having positive contributions to make in hermeneutics while also finding him an annoying panentheistic crypto-Marcionite. It has been hard to shake an impression that Borstlap is eager to valorize and scapegoat figures like Herder or Adorno than to wade into the complexities of their respective bodies of work to show how mixed their legacies are.

 

So, obviously, I’ve made it clear I differ with Borstlap on a few things.  But I have realized that right there in the subtitle may be he simplest point of divergence.  Borstlap seemsto think the muse needs to be saved, the muse of classical music.  I think the muse has moved on from orchestral repertoire. She might come back now and then to check in on the state of her previously favored idiom but where ever the muse has headed off to, you will not find her by trying to “save” her so that there can be another Beethoven’s Ninth.  She may have moved on to intercultural exchange projects.

 

What if the failure of the promise of American music has happened because people sought that future in the symphony?  What if by the time Americans were looking for the creator of the great American symphony the muse had already moved on? 

 


No comments: