Showing posts with label Len Oakes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Len Oakes. Show all posts

Saturday, January 28, 2023

Jennifer McKinney's Making Christianity Manly Again: Mark Driscoll, Mars Hill Church and American evangelicalism, Oxford University Press just came out--a brief list of the small list of books WtH actually recommends on the history of MH so far

Jennifer McKinney's book is called Making Christianity Manly Again: Mark Driscoll, Mars Hill Church, and American Evangelicalism

I've picked it up and will start reading it.  I must confess that, having written as much as I have about Mars Hill since maybe 2008 or so, I am not sure I'm going to see anything new in McKinney's book.  What's more I attended the little school by the canal and got a journalism degree there.  

I must confess I'm not holding my breath thinking there's going to be anything new in this book.  In fact I find the likelihood that it will have anything new to say compared to earlier works to be somewhere close to zero.  

I do want to take a moment to mention it because I'll be reading it and because I've got a list of stuff I've already that is thematically or directly related to Mars Hill Church that i do recommend.  I don't anticipate McKinney's book being a bad book but I'm about to share a list of books or dissertations I've read so far that touch on Mars Hill that will explain, I trust, why I don't anticipate any surprises in the new OUP volume. Books and thoughts on them after the break:

Wednesday, January 18, 2023

Len Oakes on the `career apostate' who was once part of a cult, from Prophetic Charisma

From Len Oakes’ Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities
Syracuse University Press
Copyright © 1997 by Syracuse University Press
ISBN 0-8156-2700-9
ISBN 0-8156-0398-3

From Chapter 7, “Followers and Their Quest” 

...  But charismatic involvement provides a confrontation with one's ultimate concerns. To fail therein leaves one damaged at one's core. 

Or perhaps it merely reveals an earlier damage of which one was previously unaware, a damage we all share. Perhaps there can be healing there, too. 

Leaving

Each of the groups studied had lost far more members than it had retained. And most of their original members had left. On average, less than 20 percent of those who joined, stayed on for more than five years, and fewer still stayed for ten or more years. Ex-members who still felt warmly about the leader were those who had succeeded in their great work. They had used the group for their purposes and moved on at the right time. Success gave them a new appreciation of the leader, gratitude for his help, and also pragmatism about his faults. They no longer needed to believe in him so intensely. [emphasis added] Usually by the time they were successful, they had witnessed some of the  leader's less  savory attributes-his  mistakes  and  excesses. They held few illusions about his nature but retained a fondness.  After success they felt restricted by the group and needed new challenges. The commonest pattern was to remain until the next group crisis (charismatic groups have lots of crises) and then move on.  Probably they never again joined a charismatic movement. 

Embittered ex-members tended to be those who had in some way failed at their great work. They felt conned, that they had been tricked into believing the unbelievable--and indeed some had, although most had contributed to their own miseries. [emphasis added] But there is a special pain felt by one who has deliberately chosen to abandon reason to follow another-in deep trust and love- into an unknown darkness, only to fall flat on his face. Typically, when such a follower confronts the leader over this hurt, the leader refuses to bear any responsibility for it, even mocking and rejecting the follower. Perhaps the follower did something unethical for the leader, and in the throes of guilt needs the leader to share the burden. When the leader laughingly admonishes, "Well, you did it, not me," and dresses the tragedy up as a spiritual lesson, the follower feels betrayed-"burned to the bone," as one described it--trust evaporates, and the great work is no longer possible in that situation. Now, rather than seeing the journey as the goal, the follower chooses to leave, blaming the leader when he finds out that the impossible ideal is, after all, impossible. The failed follower leaves when it suits him, sometimes with open hostility toward the group. However, there are shades of success and failure, and even in the most rigid groups there are degrees of membership. Some leave to join another charismatic group. Some leave, then rejoin and go through the previous stages again, and continue onto later stages. Some make several attempts to join a group, several attempts at a goal, each time achieving partial success; and so they come and go, remaining, ambiguously, a part of the group. 

Each stage may become a trap. Members may get stuck in one stage and lose themselves. If they don't move on, they become vulnerable to the excesses of the group.  If one doesn't find oneself in such a group, then someone else-usually the leader will possess one. Charismatic groups usually have some members who are stuck at various stages.  Leavers are sometimes those who have become stuck and withdraw rather than continue to go round and round. Lacking their old sense of purpose, they may forge a new one by opposing the leader and his group, becoming 'career apostates" (Foster 1984b).  These are disillusioned ex-followers who battle against their former group, often at great personal cost, by attempting to publicly expose every scandal associated with the group. Fortunately for them, charismatic groups usually have a lot of skeletons ln their closets and dirt under their carpets, so the "mission" of the career apostate can become a full-time vocation. [emphasis added]

After having spoken with several of these people, none of whom was necessarily "wrong" in his opposition--there genuinely were falsehoods and crimes that needed to be aired--I nevertheless gained the impression that they were driven by some need for absolution.  A common refrain ran something like "I ... was so hoodwinked while in the group that I, too, condoned or took part in these misdeeds." Hence it seems likely that career apostates are trying to make amends and assuage their own guilt through their actions. But that is not all, for there is a particular discovery that people make about themselves in charismatic groups that many find especially hard to accept. It concerns how easily one can sell one's soul, how shallow one's sense of ultimate concerns really is, and how readily one can perform the unspeakable. ...

Friday, October 15, 2021

Len Oakes on the role of charismatic rituals initiated by self-designated prophets to form social cohesion

Prophetic Charisma: The Psychology of Revolutionary Religious Personalities
Len Oakes
ISBN 9780815603986 paperback
ISBN 9780815627005 hardcover
ISBN 9780815603993 ebook

From Chapter 8: The Charismatic Moment
page 145 (or 146)
Charismatic rituals are the prophet's main creative achievement. At one and the same time the ritual satisfies the leader's narcissistic needs and transforms the followers; the former, by re-creating a world within which the leader is omnipotent, and the latter, by emotionally revitalizing all who participate in it. The rituals lay an emotional and spiritual base for the community. hence an important task, perhaps the most important task, for the prophet during this time is the construction of charismatic rituals. They are his or her framework for the exploration of love and truth. Each is a set of guidelines that allows people to come together and celebrate the mystery that lies between them. 
Hat tip to reader chris for highlighting this book!