So a year ago yesterday a whole bunch of guys who were pastors at Mars Hill or close to being pastors signed a letter expressing regret over the terminations and trials of Bent Meyer and Paul Petry.
The letter now reads as follows
Sunday, November 2, 2014
Dear Paul and Bent, we want to publicly confess our sin against you regarding events that took place at Mars Hill Church back in 2007. We were wrong. We harmed you. You have lived with the pain of that for many years. As some of us have come to each of you privately, you have extended grace and forgiveness, and for that we thank you. Because our sin against you happened in a public way and with public consequences, we want to make our confession public as well with this letter.
On September 30th 2007, you were both terminated from your employment as pastors at Mars Hill Church. Your status as elders of the church was suspended, according to the church’s bylaws at the time, pending an investigation of your qualification for eldership. It’s hard to imagine just how disorienting and painful this experience must have been for you. That night, Bent, you called Mike Wilkerson, your direct supervisor, to let him know that you’d been terminated. Within hours, Paul, you emailed all of the elders to notify us of what had happened to you that night. We had the opportunity and the responsibility to intervene, to care, to listen to you, and to make sure that any harmful treatment against you was corrected. Instead, we allowed the process of your investigation and trial to continue unimpeded and we participated in it. By failing to intervene and by participating in that process without protest, we implied to the members of Mars Hill Church, to each other, and to you and your families that your termination was above reproach. We stood by as it happened, and that was wrong.
We now believe that you were grievously sinned against in that termination. We believe that the termination meeting’s content and tone was abrupt, one sided, and threatening. Hearing each of you recount your experiences of this meeting is shocking and sad. By failing to intervene, we enabled a growing trend of misuses and abuses of power and authority that would be feared and tolerated by the rest of the church’s eldership. We now understand that these sorts of overpowering actions against elders were some of the very concerns that you had each expressed regarding some of the pending proposed changes to the bylaws. It is tragic that you were proved right by your own experiences. The harm permitted by our failure to protect you has had a devastating and lasting impact on you, your families, Mars Hill Church, and the watching world.
Paul, On October 15, 2007, all twenty-three elders at the time—including most of us signers of this letter—voted that you were in violation of the biblical qualifications of eldership. The alleged violations included a “lack of trust and respect for spiritual authority”. All but two of the elders then voted to remove you from eldership based on these perceived violations.
We now believe our decisions were invalid and wrong. The entire investigation and trial process was skewed by the implication that your termination was above reproach and for just cause. If there had been sin in your life that might have warranted a warning about possible disqualification from eldership, we should have patiently, carefully, and directly addressed it with you before the matter became so extremely escalated. By reporting our wrongheaded assessment to the church, we put doubt about your character in the minds of church members, though you had done nothing to warrant such embarrassment and scrutiny. By doing this, we misled the whole church, harmed your reputation, and damaged the unity of the body of Christ.
Bent, On October 29, 2007, all twenty-three elders at the time—including most of us signers of this letter—agreed that you were guilty of “displaying an unhealthy lack of trust in, and respect for, the senior leadership of Mars Hill Church”. We also unanimously approved that, based on your repentance, you would remain an elder of the church on probation.
Bent, we were wrong to have called you guilty of lacking trust and respect for the senior leadership of the church when you had good reasons for challenging the church’s senior leadership. We were wrong to have insisted that you repent of this lacking trust as a condition of your continued eldership, because it was not sinful on your part in the first place.
Bent and Paul, you each had every right as an elder to openly express your strong concerns about the bylaws and to influence our thinking so that we might have made the most informed decision possible. You also had good reason to contact the church’s attorney about those bylaws. These were not sinful acts of mistrust on your part, but reasonable acts of due diligence. We needed to learn from you at that time and we should have trusted you and respected your spiritual authority as elders of the church to educate us about potential problems with those bylaws. Instead, we silenced your voices through our complicity in your terminations and our decisions to remove Paul as an elder and keep Bent on probation instead of examining the issues more closely.
Paul, On December 5th, 2007 those of us who were elders at the time voted to instruct the members of Mars Hill Church to treat you as an unrepentant believer under church discipline after you had resigned your membership from the church. This treatment was to have included “rejection and disassociation” in the hope that you would “come to an acknowledgment of [your] sin and repent.” This instruction was given with the weight of all twenty-seven elders at the time. This disciplinary rejection led to great loss to your family in extreme financial hardship, sudden loss of long standing friendships, spiritual and emotional trauma to your family, and the public shaming of your character. We share responsibility for those losses due to our participation in the vote.
A church disciplinary act of this magnitude is extreme. It’s perhaps the most powerful that can be enacted upon a pastor. We now think that motion was hasty and harmful. We should have challenged the motion rather than approving it. Instead, we used our voting power as elders in a way that resulted in further harm to you. Further, we brought disrepute on the Church and its responsibility to exercise church discipline in a godly, loving and redemptive way. We failed to love you as a fellow elder and brother in Christ.
Confessing our sins against you has been a process that has taken us some time. We have engaged in self-examination, challenged our memories of what happened by reviewing the documents and interviewing one another, and spent time listening to you and your wives tell your heartbreaking stories. Many of us have met personally with each of you over the years to confess our sin and to seek forgiveness for our sinful actions and inaction. We don’t intend to convey by this letter that we are the only elders or former elders who’ve come to similar conclusions, and we hope that in time, the others will join us in public confession. Our desire is to clear the reproach from your names.
We hope that our confession also brings healing to the many past and present members of Mars Hill Church whose hearts were broken for you and your families as a result of our sin. As part of our commitment to walk in repentance, we invite anyone who has been impacted by our sins against you to contact any of us so we can continue to walk in repentance by listening, confessing, and asking for forgiveness.
Paul and Bent, we are sorry for our sinful behavior toward you, for harming you, and for bringing shame to Christ’s church. We hope that you will forgive us. May the peace and grace of our Lord heal our hearts.
Signed,
Mars Hill Elders as of October, 2007
—Scott Thomas
—Dave Kraft
—Gary Shavey
—Steve Tompkins
—Brad House
—Phil Smidt
—Mike Wilkerson
—James Harleman
—Lief Moi
—Adam Sinnett
—Jesse Winkler
—Zack Hubert
—Tim Reber
—James Dahlman
—Dick McKinley
Additional Mars Hill Elders as of December 5th, 2007
—Jon Krombein
—Matt Johnson
—Joe Day
Mark Driscoll's never apologized for his chuckling comments about the pile of dead bodies behind the Mars Hill bus. He's been willing to complain about how other people steal your stuff when you go into ministry without so much as a word about whether he's had a good idea that wasn't second or third hand since 2013.
To go by his LinkedIn profile lately, Bubba Jennings would just as soon not mention he was ever a pastor at Mars Hill at all, let alone one of the executive elders in power at the time of the 2007 by-laws controversy and the terminations.
Let's not forget what Jamie Munson said about the terminations and trials:
http://joyfulexiles.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/10-01-2007-email-from-jmunson.pdf
Some might conclude this is a political move to gain more support for the bylaws as Paul and bent were outspoken critics of the current direction. [emphasis added] This is not the case, the executive team wants to conduct itself in a way that is full of integrity, walking in the light, under full disclosure and in a decisive manner that best serves Jesus and His church through Mars Hill. If the bylaws don't pass, so be it, we didn't want to wait on what we had determined were necessary and inevitable firings until after the bylaws had been voted into approval because that would have been deceptive. [emphasis added] We made the decision to terminate them now and givem them the option to resign or undergo the full investigation. We have a higher value of being men of integrity than playing politics to swing a vote in our favor.
Jamie Munson later resigned in 2011, for reasons that have never been explained, from executive leadership at Mars Hill. The memo from Turner leaked to Warren Throckmorton seemed to indicate that at least someone in the upper echelons of Mars Hill executive world considered Munson to be "checked out" and to have left Mars Hill on the brink of financial ruin.
http://wp.production.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/files/2014/09/Current-Financial-Situation-March-17-12.pdf
Executive Elders
Current Financial Situation
Saturday, March 17, 2012...
After being at Mars Hill for 10 months and in my current role for 3 months, I now have a picture of a very broken and fundamentally financially unsustainable organization. I am sorry that I have not been able to really see the financial picture of the organization until just this week. So many distractions with A29, Real Marriage, GWOW, distractions with Churches, my Eldership, and a very incompetent staff when I arrived has kept me from not seeing the picture. But now I see the organization very clearly and we have some difficult decisions to make.
One of the greatest and most harmful events was Pastor Jamie resigning and leaving me in this job as General Manager/Executive Elder. From early June until he resigned in August, he had basically checked out. So I had less than 6 weeks as General Manager before becoming #1 King without being an Elder. Then finally in November, I was made an Executive Pastor without have any creditability with the staff. This single fact hindered my ability to really even understand the organization or the people, much less see the problems as they had existed for a long time.
This looks like someone was saying that under Munson's tenure the fiscal incompetence of Mars Hill nearly destroyed the corporation. Now if there's anyone, anyone at all, who would like to contest that accounting of Mars Hill they're welcome to speak up if they don't feel inhibited by the possibility of threats from whatever quarter. Meanwhile, it would appear from the leaked document that someone in the executive leadership scene came to the belief that the leadership culture Munson bequeathed him was ruinously bad.
Which might suggest the possibility that the ... kinda kangaroo court proceedings against Meyer and Petry took them to task for having doubts about the leadership ability of some people who, to go by the leaked memo, had provided some reasons for doubt.
What was striking about that memo, as I've commented on at some length, is that the problems of fiscal risks and a culture of entitlement in the leadership scene were things I had concerns about back around 2009.
If Mark Driscoll Ministries has glided over the history of Mark Driscoll founding or co-founding ministries that die ignominiously or that publicly distance themselves from him or omit mention of him, Jamie Munson presided over a single ministry that has been spending 2015 in a process of dissolution.
So if nearly every man who voted to go with the termination and trials of 2007 (except for a few dudes) has concluded the whole thing was a sinful sham that harmed the local church and damaged the lives of men and their families; men that Mark Driscoll recruited into ministry based on his self-described keen gifts; should that give us all a moment of pause (to put it ever so mildly) about the competencies and spiritual maturity of the guys who, to this day, have not signed on the above-mentioned letter and were part of the executive leadership team that decreed the trials take place?
If Jamie Munson still believes the firings were necessary and inevitable he's welcome to explain himself. It's all the more salient a question what on earth made the terminations and trials necessary and inevitable in the eyes of Mark Driscoll, Jamie Munson and Bubba Jennings as executive elders in 2007 now that fellow former executive elder Scott Thomas signed his name on the letter a year ago yesterday that stated the terminations and trials were sinful mistakes.
1 comment:
Thanks for the quick history recounting, WtH. It's startling to read the Elders' Letter of Complicity and Repentance, followed by Jamie Munson's Letter regarding the sham of a "painful and personal" investigation and trial into Paul and Bent's lives. That statement on its own sounds so blatantly like a personal threat and attempt at intimidation = akin to "You go away quietly or we will dig until we find something."
Great side by side comparison of the elders who wrote the letter and are willing to admit their own weakness and seek Paul and Bent's forgiveness vs Jamie's brazen manipulative letter. It's hard to read the accusation that Jamie actually wrote for Paul and Bent with a straight face. **Unhealthy favoritism for establishing son as a leader in youth ministry. Unheard of! How could a pastor actually believe their own son could show leadership in the church? I kid, I kid. It just seems so clear now that Jamie was in so far over his head and had little to zero amount of Godly perspective and wisdom in how to deal with resistance to the bylaws that either he or Mark Driscoll were going to push through.
Post a Comment