Saturday, October 24, 2015

another HT Mockingbird, "Why Twitter's Dying and what you can learn from it", a polemic that defines Twitter as an abusive trolling platform by its nature

http://www.mbird.com/2015/10/the-areopagus-and-the-woodshed-re-imagining-abuse-in-social-media/

https://medium.com/bad-words/why-twitter-s-dying-and-what-you-can-learn-from-it-9ed233e37974#.a4h1wvogn

...

To explain, let me be clear what I mean by abuse. I don’t just mean the obvious: violent threats. I also mean the endless bickering, the predictable snark, the general atmosphere of little violences that permeate the social web…and the fact that the average person can’t do anything about it.
 
We once glorified Twitter as a great global town square, a shining agora where everyone could come together to converse. But I’ve never been to a town square where people can shove, push, taunt, bully, shout, harass, threaten, stalk, creep, and mob you…for eavesdropping on a conversation that they weren’t a part of…to alleviate their own existential rage…at their shattered dreams…and you can’t even call a cop. What does that particular social phenomenon sound like to you? Twitter could have been a town square. But now it’s more like a drunken, heaving mosh pit. And while there are people who love to dive into mosh pits, they’re probably not the audience you want to try to build a billion dollar publicly listed company that changes the world upon.
 
The social web became a nasty, brutish place. And that’s because the companies that make it up simply do not not just take abuse seriously…they don’t really consider it at all. Can you remember the last time you heard the CEO of a major tech company talking about…abuse…not ads? Why not? Here’s the harsh truth: they see it as peripheral to their “business models”, a minor nuisance, certainly nothing worth investing in, for theirs is the great endeavor of…selling more ads.
 
...
 
What really happens on Twitter these days? People have self-sorted into cliques, little in-groups, tribes. The purpose of tribes is to defend their beliefs, their ways, their customs, their culture — their ways of seeing the world. The digital world is separated into “ists” — it doesn’t matter what, really, economists, mens-rightists, leftists, rightists — and those “ists” place their “ism” before and above all, because it is their organizing belief, the very faith that has brought them together in the first place. Hence, to them, it’s the totem to which everyone, including you, must pay homage, and if you dare not to bow down before it…or worse still to challenge it…well, then the faithful will do what they must to defend their gods. They will declare a crusade against you.
 
Having never seen any need at any point to join the twitter bandwagon it's perhaps too easy to see the whole thing as a troll-a-thon or a self-promotional shill-fest. Now if people understand what's at stake in using social media as a form of mass media and recognize what they're using it for, great.  Some of the biggest give aways of information in the midst of the Andrew scenario at Mars Hill were through tweets. It's what made the Mars Hill "we're protecting the privacy of parties involved" such an incompetent sham, it was because a couple of parties involved had blogged and tweeted away their identities without their even having fully realized it. They probably could not have known what it was at the time, though.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

No comments: