Sunday, August 09, 2015

DG Hart on the unscrupulous and dishonest pragmatism of Daleiden, a few thoughts on the lack of a real need for secretly obtained content in many cases of journalistic research

http://oldlife.org/2015/08/journalists-and-saints-together/
...
But here’s the worst part of the journalistic-ethics defense of Daleiden. If a journalist went to a Roman Catholic archbishop and presented himself as a member of the church and in need of sacramental grace as part of a way of doing an expose of clerical sexual misconduct, what would the social conservatives say? Is that the way journalists behave? How loud would the outcry be over such dishonesty?
 
Or how about a reporter who while doing an interview with Mitt Romney to gain better access to insider information, what if that reporter presented himself as a fellow Mormon (when he wasn’t) and a regular donor to the GOP (which he didn’t)? Would anyone possibly take that “reporter” seriously as a journalist? Would Romney or his staff?

None of this means that Daleiden doesn’t deserve some credit for exposing a truly despicable aspect of American society. But if he is going to claim either the mantle of journalistic ethics or Christian morality, can’t we/I question that?

While this could inspire some ruminations on what some call watchblogging, that's for some other time ... maybe.

No comments: